|
Trans-fat rules spur race for new
foods Labels must show content by
2006
By Lorene Yue Tribune staff
reporter Published July 10,
2003
New labeling
requirements for trans-fat content are expected to spur foodmakers
to aggressively develop and market healthier
offerings.
Giants such as Kraft Foods and Frito-Lay have
already taken steps to trim the fat, reported to cause heart
disease, given rising consumer interest in healthier foods. The new
requirements, announced Wednesday by the Food and Drug
Administration, will only accelerate those changes, observers
said.
"You are going to
have companies that will want to take advantage of having no trans
fats," said Rhona Applebaum, executive vice president of the
National Food Processors Association in Washington, D.C. "They've
done a lot of innovative things to stay ahead of the power
pack."
Trans fats are primarily found in processed foods and
are formed when vegetable oils are processed into a solid or more
stable liquid form. Trans fats are reported to raise cholesterol
levels and clog arteries.
Many doctors consider trans fats to
be worse than saturated fats, which are already listed on food
labels.
Foodmakers have until January 2006 to include
trans-fat content on product labels. Many are expected to update
labels much sooner to try to tout the nutritional makeup of their
products.
Frito-Lay, for instance, already discloses the
trans-fat content of its snack foods. The company says the trans-fat
content is zero for its Ruffles and Lay's potato chips, Rold Gold
pretzel snacks and Fritos corn chips.
Last September the unit
of PepsiCo. Inc. switched to corn oil for cooking its Doritos,
Cheetos and Tostitos snacks to eliminate trans fats from
them.
While some Frito-Lay items have trans fats, roughly 90
percent of the company's retail sales come from products that are
void of trans fats, said Charles Nicolas, a Frito-Lay
spokesman.
Northfield-based Kraft Foods Inc. supports the
FDA's push to label products with trans fats, said spokeswoman Kris
Charles.
The company, which makes Oreo cookies and Cheese
Nips, feels "that information can only be helpful to consumers," she
said. "You always have to read labels and make an educated decision
on what you are going to consume."
Kraft said last week it
would embark on a three-year program aimed at reducing portion sizes
of some foods, creating new nutritional standards and possibly
expanding nutritional information on package labels.
Kraft
said the initiative, set to start in 2004, would help combat rising
obesity rates in the U.S.
Perhaps the biggest challenge
facing food manufacturers is finding a trans-fat substitute that
does not compromise what consumers are accustomed to
eating.
"It is important to develop an alternate ingredient
that has the same taste, texture and quality," Charles
said.
Fiber Gel Technologies Inc. of Mundelein may have one
solution that could be available by the end of the year.
The
company is using technology licensed from the U.S. Department of
Agriculture to process grain hulls into a gel or powder that may be
used as a substitute for trans fat and saturated fat. Fiber Gel's
high-fiber, low-calorie product would have properties similar to
fat.
"This FDA action has got to help our efforts in
launching a new product that can address the health and obesity
problems facing our country," said Edward Halpern, a Fiber Gel
spokesman.
Food industry experts do not expect consumers to
pay more for food due to costs associated to create the new
labels.
Wednesday's ruling is the first modification to the
mandatory nutritional fact panel since it began appearing on food
packaging in 1993.
Despite efforts of the FDA and food
manufacturers, many consumers disregard food labels.
"This
decision isn't going to shift consumer purchasing habits," said
Stephanie Childs, a spokeswoman for the Grocery Manufacturers of
America in Washington, D.C.
"Consumers will still base their
food on taste first. The whole point is to give them better
information about the food they
choose."
Tribune staff reporter Jon Van
contributed to this report.
Copyright � 2003, Chicago Tribune
|
|